South African skipper Graeme Smith declared his team’s innings closed at 584 runs for the loss of 9 wickets during the 2nd test versus Pakistan at Abu Dhabi. One of the unbeaten batsmen was so close to a personal landmark, many fans were aghast that Smith declared at the juncture he did. No, I’m not talking about Morne Morkel, but in all fairness I should as Morne was just 5 runs from his personal best of 40.
AB De Villiers was on 278 with only 22 runs to get his first 300 against a tired Pakistani attack that had already sent down 153 overs. Graeme Smith responded thus for all the folks that let him know what they thought of his declaration on Twitter:
“Taking heat tonight on twitter for not letting AB go for 300.#you definitely can’t pls [please] everyone. Always base decision on what’s best for team.”
Few things that may have skipped the casual fans’ attention:
- Graeme probably never thought of AB De Villiers getting to 300. At tea break on the 2nd day, AB was on 263 with the team total at 568 in 151 overs. Smith could have declared right then and there, instead of AB and Morkel coming out for a bit of bashing for just a couple of overs.
- Smith allowed AB to achieve one personal landmark of 278, the highest score by a South African player in tests. The previous holder of the record – you guessed it – Smith with his 277 against England in 2003 at Birmingham. If people thought Smith was as heartless as the decision to declare might seem to indicate, they have it wrong. He could’ve easily declared it at Tea but he let AB get to 278.
- Smith also had to include in his thought process the jailbreak act performed by Younis Khan in the first test. So, he needed to have as many overs as possible at the Pakistani batsmen as possible. In addition to that, they have been losing overs due to bad light conditions as well.
- I am sure Smith had a chat with AB during the tea break and told him of the upcoming declaration as soon as AB got to 278. There hasn’t been a single peep of “disappointment” out of AB. In fact, he paid tribute to Smith.
I’d like to dedicate that knock to Graeme,” said de Villiers. “He showed a lot of class in his captaincy by allowing me to go through and to get that record. I thought we could have declared a bit earlier but he wanted me to push on and to get that record [278].
There is a school of thought that would say that using up a few more overs (3-5) is not that big a deal in the overall scheme of things and Smith should have let AB get to 300 which is a pretty rare accomplishment. I disagree. It is only a two-test series. So, South Africa has to do all the running if they were to win the series, with the first test being drawn. Pakistan, having let South Africa bat for more than 5 sessions, will be happy with a draw in this match, and a 0-0 series result. Considering all the turmoil that this Pakistan team has gone through in the recent times, a 0-0 series result against the world’s second ranked test team would be as good as a series win.
This incident brings back to me, memories of one such incident in the not too distant past, when Rahul Dravid, while standing in for Sourav Ganguly as the captain of the Indian team in the first test of the series against (and in) Pakistan in 2004, declared the innings close when Sachin Tendulkar was on 194 and all hell broke loose. There were murmurings but it blew up in to a full scale media inquisition of Dravid when Tendulkar mentioned in the press conference that he was “disappointed” and “let down”.
When the 4th wicket of the Indian first innings fell, Tendulkar was on 153. The innings was declared close at 675/5. In the partnership of 110 for the 5th wicket, Yuvraj scored 59 and Tendulkar, the established partner who had already faced 300+ deliveries, scored only 49. John Wright, the former Indian coach writes in book “Indian Summers” about this situation: “At tea he [Dravid] told the batsmen he wanted 15 or 16 overs at the Pakistanis, and after tea a couple of messages went out. As I sat there watching the innings grind on, it crossed my mind that Tendulkar needed to get a move on… A final message went out saying they had one more over. Then Yuvraj got run out going for a quick single and Dravid called them in.” You know how many overs India bowled at Pakistan that evening? 16.
In the final scheme of that match’s result itself, another over or two would not have mattered. India won comfortably by an innings and 52 runs with only needing to take one wicket on the fifth day to seal the win. But I tend to agree with Dravid’s move here. He had to make a decision and it wasn’t a “spur of the moment” decision either. He had given Tendulkar sufficient heads up and Tendulkar failed to get a move on after the tea break. In the 13.5 overs after the tea break, Yuvraj scored 48 runs and Sachin 29. His last 20 runs (from 174 to 194) took 26 balls (which is not bad at all) but considering the situation it was slow, while Yuvraj – the new batsman in – scored 37 runs in 39 balls.
This goes beyond the slowness of Tendulkar’s batting. I liked it from the perspective of establishing an order within the Indian squad that the team came before any individual landmark, even (gasp) Sachin Tendulkar. If Tendulkar had any issues, he needed to sort it out in the dressing room and not air it out in a press conference. That was unbecoming of the great man. India has had, historically, a few characters that seemed to play for personal records. I am not saying Tendulkar was one but that action by Dravid laid it out clearly where the priorities of the players needed to be.
Wright writes towards the end of that chapter that, “Then he [Tendulkar] and Dravid talked it through and resolved the matter.” And, here we have a situation with De Villiers where he is paying tribute to his skipper. May be there is something to be learned from it?
———————
Article by Subash Jayaraman
Mahek
November 22, 2010
Why go back to 2004 when just earlier this year fans were criticising Dhoni for hitting fours and sixes instead of giving the strike to Tendulkar who was trying to get to his 200 one single at a time because he was cramping up?
thecricketcouch
November 22, 2010
Cricket fans, especially Indian fans and among those, that have the blinders on for Sachin, ruin the fun of the game for everybody else. But I didn’t consider the ODI scenario as I wanted to keep it “apples to apples”.
It was an inevitability really that SRT was going to get to 200. He got up to 160+ against NZ but then had to retire hurt. Got to 175 in Hyd vs Aus and McKay got him with that loopy down the leg slow bouncer. That SA match, Dhoni played it perfectly. Hammered the advantage home and made sure SRT got there as well. People that cribbed about Dhoni don’t really understand the concept of team sport I suppose. Tendulkar may get 200, but if India go on to lose, how good is that 200?
Viren
November 22, 2010
To be clear, I understand the need for declaring at the end of day 2 and as always end of days are crucial in a test match and I am not criticizing Smith for doing what he did. My problem, from a casual fan’s point of view, is using the explanation of the ubiquitous “team comes first” slogan to fit our scenarios. It’s a given that no individual is greater than the team and the game should be played that way – but then why consider it Smith’s magnanimity to allow AB to go past even his own record, when SA would have been better served to declare then. Why not use the same reasoning to declare when he was on 261 but then go ahead and use it at 278? Why not give him another 8 overs? SA would still have about 10 overs in the day which are no less crucial to make an impact.
And the way AB handled is the way it should always be handled.
thecricketcouch
November 22, 2010
Firstly, Thanks for the text message that got me thinking about the article. It is a tough call for the Captain to make. I suppose the thinking process would be that — Okay, we are going to want to bowl at the other team at least these many overs and I want our total to be so and so. Whenever that condition is satisfied, he has to declare. Having clear lines of communications with your teammates helps in avoiding misunderstandings.
In this AB case – I’m sure they (Smith, AB and perhaps coach) had a chit chat and wanted to declare at tea and if AB were to be still around, and close to any of the two landmarks that matter to Saffas, he would let him get to it. Remember, the last wicket partnership when declared was 107. Morne could’ve got out any time and the decision to declare could’ve been take away from Smith. I am thinking that Smith prolly wanted the entire post-tea session to bowl at Pak but since AB was that close to 277, he let him have it.
Also, important thing to note is that AB went hell for leather before and after the tea break, unlike SRT who was quite content to take his own time (as indicated by Wright as well).
Masuud Qazi
November 22, 2010
Brilliant piece! Just what was needed!
It makes so much sense since history of test cricket is filled with such incidents, especially the ones which have involved the subcontinent players. The issues and the stupidity that has been hyped and played for the benefits of whoever wanted to, be it a great player or a whole lobby.
The example of Sachin is a classic example. As much as I’ve respected that man for his great aura and humility in the game and the legacy of gentleman-ism he had carried over the years, such incident is a blot on all of it, with due regards to all Sachin worshipers reading this.
thecricketcouch
November 22, 2010
I wouldn’t go as far as to say its just subcontinental players. Geoffrey Boycott immediately springs to mind.
I mean, some of the highest scores ever recorded, such Lara’s 400, Sanath’s 340 were all scored in useless fashion. What’s the point in accumulating runs if they are not setting up your team to win?
One person I don’t mind piling on scores is Sehwag. He does it so fast, that you still have plenty of time left in the test to think about a win.
Masuud Qazi
November 22, 2010
Here, I would like to bring another major example in the history of IndoPak cricket. Javed Miandad scored the famous 280 not out vs India in Hyderabad. Imran Khan declared the innings when Javed was all set for a triple hundred. Imran, as widely acclaimed as the greatest captain of Pakistan and one of the best ever in the world cricket, knew what was the priority. Indeed, the team ad the win was. And indeed it turned out to be, with Pakistan winning that test by an innings. There was much hype created by his decision, which was no surprise, with the media and the Karachi and Punjabi lobbies going off at each other exploiting this incident. Imran whether or not consulting with Miandad during the innings or in the breaks is not clear till today and has various accounts from different people, but the way the incident was played with, was not pretty. So famous this incident became that Miandad dedicated a whole chapter to this decision of Imran and the issues related to it in his autobiography!
We all know its really tough to be logical in such emotional circumstances with personal glory of a batsman at stake, par nothing comes more crucial than a team’s interests. Whatever a player’s performance be, at the end of the day its for the team and the country. No player, no matter how great he be, cannot be above the game. The player is great by the game, not that the game is great by that player! Its as simple as that.
thecricketcouch
November 22, 2010
My biggest sticking point with Sachin’s 194 (besides the fact that he aired his dirty laundry to the press) is that he knew the situation. So he needed to pick up the pace for team’s cause and if he got the 200, great. If he got out looking for quick runs, I’d appreciate the fact that he got out going for the team’s cause.
Tendulkar is one of the greats of the game (Duh!) and he has single handedly carried the team a lot of times and I absolutely love and respect him for that. He has always stayed humble, tried to steer away from controversies and all that, but the fact that he felt aggrieved about the declaration (basically selling your captain out) is not ok in my book.
Aasif Sheikh
November 22, 2010
Graeme Smith made the right decision as he did discuss with AB De Villiers and did what is good for cricket!
knowledge_eater
November 22, 2010
Brilliant article, the lesson people should have learned long time ago. Dravid should have declared it long time ago but knowing the fact that Yuvi was grabbing runs at other hand, that prompted him not to declare at that time. Sachin should have hurried up. And about the comment he made ‘disappointed’, well he could have handled it better, but knowing he plays cricket like he plays with high-school mates and sharing dressing room with him for these many years, I wasn’t surprised by his ‘disappointed’ remark. And, Dravid plan worked and India manages to win. Was Dravid’s intention was not to give him 200 runs ? NO, thats for effigies market and media to feast on.
So, the lesson to be learned here, is declare the inning when it suppose to be declared. But, no-one does, and then stretch it, when they stretch is there is landmark up for grabs always.. more stretch and there some record to grab for it.
India managed to win test on that day was great and right on target. Smith should have declared the inning long time ago as well. Now, what will he do if Pakistan manages to draw this one as well!
I don’t like when dressing room talk comes out to press. We don’t know what’s the strategies, we don’t what’s the team plan. And when it does come out, effigies stock market goes up that year.
Declared when you suppose to declare but don’t stretch to the extent, when there is always something up for grabs. If any players say they don’t look for personal landmark, everyone of them is lying. Sometimes they just keep it inside and never let it out, sometimes they do. But everyone wants to beat everyone.
India is handling personal land-mark way better than many top teams, to be honest, because most of the big personal records are rarely draws.
I just hope what would happen on the day when Sehwag plays 418 balls. It will cause total destruction. And yes, he was also disappointed seeing Randiv no-balled it.
Do players feel ‘shit’ when they miss out on landmark? YES everyone feel slightly to severe level of disappointed. But does it change atmosphere of dressing room! I doubt it.
Gaurav
November 22, 2010
Subash, to add to your point about the Lara 400, not only was it useless, it was a blatant example of a captain-batsman putting his personal glory ahead of the team. I remember following the match, and considering how flat that Antigua track was, wondering why Lara kept going and going. The WI bowlers had been having trouble getting 20 wickets all series and needed ample time. If I remember correctly, it was the 5th match of a series that England had already taken 4-0.
WI were in a strong 650+ position with Lara well past 300. But he kept going, wasting time. I expected him to at least declare after crossing Hayden’s 380 and taking the record back. But he was hell-bent on entering the history books and took, if I remember correctly, 10 overs or so to get from 380 to 400, almost all in singles.
The most dishonest or deluded part came when he was asked about why he declared so late and his response was something along the lines of “I thought we needed to get to 750 to be in a winnable position and not bat again.” Huh??
As it happened, England escaped with a draw. A declaration around 650 would have *probably* won WI the match. Ironically, I ended up losing the most respect for Lara on the same day he made the highest score in test history.
Mahek
November 22, 2010
I think Lara could’ve tried to score quicker so that his bowlers had more overs at the England batsmen. That said, I don’t think he put his record over his team’s interests. He wasn’t entirely wrong about needing 750 to not bat again. England were bundled out for just 285 in the first innings but they managed to survive 137 overs in the second to save the match and scored 707 runs in the process. A declaration at 650 might have meant the Windies needing to bat again if they managed to get England out twice. Considering they were just 5 down at close of play, how many more wickets would they have lost in another 25 overs? The bowlers just couldn’t finish the job. There can always be the odd passage of play where we can say a team could’ve done better. Sometimes the right decision may still result in failure while the wrong decision may lead to success.
thecricketcouch
November 23, 2010
@Aasif — Thank you for visiting the site. Keep reading.
@Kowledge Eater – That’s the dilemma captain faces. Its not an exact science. However, if the channels of communication between the captain and the team member are clear, there wouldn’t be much problems, no matter what the Captain decides. In cases where the Captain doesn’t let the player know in advance, the players still need to believe that the Captain made the decision with the best interest of the team in mind. Even if there is a problem, the player needs to take it up with the captain and take care of it within the dressing room.
@Gaurav and @Mahek – Lara was on a tear during that stretch where he scored 501 for Warwickshire (I think) and the 375. I am convinced he was motivated to get the highest scorer record back from Hayden and his batathon to get 400. People consider Lara the finest batsman of the last 20 years, but these displays don’t really do it for me. I still will go with SRT.
Mahek
November 23, 2010
There is nothing wrong in being motivated about scoring a quadruple hundred. I don’t think he slowed down. He could’ve batted quicker but then we can also say the bowlers should have done their job. They took just 5 second innings in 137 overs after bowling England out for just 285 in the first innings. We can also say Ridley Jacobs who was batting at the other end could’ve scored faster (Check his strike rate) yet the blame falls on Lara because people seem to think they know what goes on inside the minds of cricketers.
Suneer Chowdhary
November 24, 2010
Hello Subhash,
Visited the site for the first time, and read this one – a topic pretty close to my heart. I remember my shock when SRT spoke against the declaration in the press co. I almost said to myself – no, this cannot be the omni-politically correct SRT speaking his mind, and that, about an issue that concerned him and only him.
It is difficult to say whether SRT or SG play/played only for records, but when we have commentators and experts and fans hyping centuries and doubles so much, it is only fair that the cricketers would get affected.
In short, barring a handful players – a Sehwag and probably an Azharuddin – not too many Indian cricketers would react in a manner that AB did after that 278. It is a mental make-up of what we are. Why, I think the first thing that Gavaskar told SRT when he made his debut is that he would be very cross if he didn’t get to 50 Test centuries!
Sunny
February 8, 2011
all excellent points above but i am yet to see a captain declare when nearing a milestone.